Dr. Ricky Rood's Climate Change Blog |
|
| Posted by: Dr. Ricky Rood, 2:12 AM GMT en Noviembre 11, 2010 | +2 |

| Permalink | A A A |
|
|
I'm a professor at U Michigan and lead a course on climate change problem solving. These articles include ideas from the course. And no tuition!
|
Tropical Blogs
Tropical Weather Stickers®
Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 — Blog Index
Again Calculate the Kinetic Energy in the Gulfstream! Ya'll still don't get it yet do you?
November 11, 2010
Last month, NASA reported it was the hottest January-September on record. That followed a terrific analysis, “July 2010 — What Global Warming Looks Like,” which noted that 2010 is “likely” to be warmest year on record.
This month continues the trend of 2010 outpacing previous years, according to NASA:
Link
Nov 11, 2010; 3:51 PM ET
The period from January 2010 to October 2010 was the warmest Jan-Oct period on record globally, according to NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS). Records go back to 1880.
Link
To much heat causes to much water vapor which can cause to much flooding! Thanks GHGs! We need to cool it just like the movie. I showed you how to cool it! Now will you all listen to me?
img src="">
Below 2007 again! Ouch!
LOL! I know just a figure of speech! Some So2 may work however.BTW just how much cooler could all that deep cold ocean water make the Earth?
Caribbean Reef Ecosystems May Not Survive Repeated Stress
November 15, 2010
NOAA diver with a one square meter quadrat examining a bleached reef (Montastraea) colony in St. Croix, USVI in Oct., 2005.
NOAA diver with a one square meter quadrat examining a bleached reef (Montastraea) colony in St. Croix, USVI in Oct., 2005.
High resolution (Credit: NOAA)
Coral reefs suffered record losses as a consequence of high ocean temperatures in the tropical Atlantic and Caribbean in 2005 according to the most comprehensive documentation of basin-scale bleaching to date. Collaborators from 22 countries report that more than 80 percent of surveyed corals bleached and over 40 percent of the total surveyed died, making this the most severe bleaching event ever recorded in the basin. The study appears in PLoS ONE, an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication.
Link
ScienceDaily (Nov. 16, 2010) — The troposphere, the lower part of the atmosphere closest to the Earth, is warming and this warming is broadly consistent with both theoretical expectations and climate models, according to a new scientific study that reviews the history of understanding of temperature changes and their causes in this key atmospheric layer.Scientists at NOAA, the NOAA-funded Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites (CICS), the United Kingdom Met Office, and the University of Reading in the United Kingdom contributed to the paper, "Tropospheric Temperature Trends: History of an Ongoing Controversy," a review of four decades of data and scientific papers to be published by Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, a peer-reviewed journal.
The paper documents how, since the development of the very first climate models in the early 1960s, the troposphere has been projected to warm along with the Earth's surface because of the increasing amounts of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. This expectation has not significantly changed even with major advances in climate models and is in accord with our basic physical understanding of atmospheric processes.
In the 1990s, observations did not show the troposphere, particularly in the tropics, to be warming, even though surface temperatures were rapidly warming. This lack of tropospheric warming was used by some to question both the reality of the surface warming trend and the reliability of climate models as tools. This new paper extensively reviews the relevant scientific analyses -- 195 cited papers, model results and atmospheric data sets -- and finds that there is no longer evidence for a fundamental discrepancy and that the troposphere is warming.
"Looking at observed changes in tropospheric temperature and climate model expectations over time, the current evidence indicates that no fundamental discrepancy exists, after accounting for uncertainties in both the models and observations," said Peter Thorne, a senior scientist with CICS in Asheville, N.C., and a senior researcher at North Carolina State University. CICS is a consortium jointly led by the University of Maryland and North Carolina State University.
This paper demonstrates the value of having various types of measurements -- from surface stations to weather balloons to satellites -- as well as multiple independent analyses of data from these observation systems.
Link
A few more data points and we should get the line back correct?
I think Martini is reading that chart bassackwards! LOL!
DoverWxwatcher,
Thanks for your response to this individual who needs more tutoring!
If you cool the oceans does this cool the planet?
Yes or No and why?
His formula for balancing the intractable Carbon issue, with Population, GDP, and Technology development is also useful for the intractable water resource shortage issue.
Population, Growth, and technology are all in the same parts of the equation and conservation/technology is the only part that can viably be manipulated with any chance of success. It has produced drip irrigation, low flow toilets and showerheads, Zeriscaping, etc.
Similar to the carbon problem, we need a grip on how rapidly we need to improve conservation, reuse, and wise use infrastructure.
JFLORIDA,
I already thought of this idea long ago to place scoops on a fleet of nuclear subs that would thrust cold water upward in front of the storms. However, they didn't produce electrical power to reduce GHGs and the fuel they burn would also warm the oceans thus causing more global warming. The Tunnels are a better option according to the hurricane center!
ScienceDaily (Nov. 17, 2010) — In September, 2007, the Anaktuvuk River Fire burned more than 1,000 square kilometers of tundra on Alaska's North Slope, doubling the area burned in that region since record keeping began in 1950. A new analysis of sediment cores from the burned area revealed that this was the most destructive tundra fire at that site for at least 5,000 years. Models built on 60 years of climate and fire data found that even moderate increases in warm-season temperatures in the region dramatically increase the likelihood of such fires.
JFLORIDA,
Sorry! LOL!
ScienceDaily (Nov. 17, 2010) — In September, 2007, the Anaktuvuk River Fire burned more than 1,000 square kilometers of tundra on Alaska's North Slope, doubling the area burned in that region since record keeping began in 1950. A new analysis of sediment cores from the burned area revealed that this was the most destructive tundra fire at that site for at least 5,000 years. Models built on 60 years of climate and fire data found that even moderate increases in warm-season temperatures in the region dramatically increase the likelihood of such fires.The study was published this October in the Journal of Geophysical Research.
After the Anaktuvuk fire, University of Illinois plant biology professor Feng Sheng Hu sought to answer a simple question: Was this seemingly historic fire an anomaly, or were large fires a regular occurrence in the region?
"If such fires occur every 200 years or every 500 years, it's a natural event," Hu said. "But another possibility is that these are truly unprecedented events caused by, say, greenhouse warming."
On a trip to Alaska in 2008, Hu chartered a helicopter to the region of the Anaktuvuk fire and collected sediment cores from two affected lakes. He and his colleagues analyzed the distribution of charcoal particles in these cores and used established techniques to determine the approximate ages of different sediment layers.
The team found no evidence of a fire of similar scale and intensity in sediments representing roughly 5,000 years at that locale.
Link
Viewing: 51 - 101
Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 — Blog Index